BANDA ACEH | INDATANEWS.COM - The controversy surrounding the issuance of a case termination order (SP3) by the Aceh Barat Police has intensified once again. The latest escalation was triggered by demonstrations outside the police headquarters and growing narratives circulating in digital spaces, which the legal counsel considers a deliberate attempt at reputational damage. In response, Berliana Siregar, S.H., representing the legal team of Muhammad Amin, Muhardi, and Muklis, issued a legal statement she described as final, unequivocal, and non-negotiable.
The legal representative emphasized that following the issuance of the SP3, the situation has increasingly shifted beyond legal boundaries and is instead being influenced by public pressure outside proper judicial procedures.
SP3 As A Lawful Legal Product
Berliana stressed that the SP3 issued by the
Aceh Barat Police constitutes a lawful legal document. It indicates that the investigation was formally discontinued due to insufficient evidence to proceed with the case. This decision, she said, reflects the professionalism, transparency, and accountability of law enforcement authorities.
"This SP3 is clear evidence that our clients are innocent and that all allegations made by the complainant are fabricated," Berliana stated on Friday, July 3, 2026.
Pretrial Review As Legal Mechanism
The legal team further urged the complainant to pursue formal legal remedies if they disagree with the SP3 decision. The only available legal avenue, she noted, is a pretrial hearing (Praperadilan) under Article 77 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) at the district court.
Adherence To Criminal Procedure Law
Berliana also underscored that demonstrations aimed at influencing public opinion do not align with the principles of a lawful criminal justice process. According to her, disputes must be resolved strictly through established judicial mechanisms rather than through public pressure.
Power Of Attorney Validity And Role Of Legal Representatives
The legal team further pointed to alleged formal deficiencies in the power of attorney used by the complainant's side. The document reportedly combines different legal entities, including a commercial law firm and a legal aid organization.
"This situation creates ambiguity regarding the legal standing of the authorized representative and may constitute a violation of administrative law principles," Berliana said.
Warning Over Unauthorized Legal Assistance
The team also raised concerns regarding the involvement of paralegals in the proceedings, suggesting that certain actions may exceed legal authority.
"Citizens should be cautious of unauthorized legal assistants who act without official professional responsibility," Berliana warned.
Cybercrime And Social Media Content Dissemination
In addition, the legal representatives highlighted activities in digital spaces, particularly the dissemination of videos and narratives related to the protests. These actions, they said, could potentially lead to legal consequences under cyber law provisions.
Reference was made to Article 27A of Law No. 1 of 2024 on the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law, as well as Articles 310 and 311 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) concerning defamation and slander.
Public Warning And Threat Of Legal Action
The legal team concluded by issuing a public warning to the complainants, their supporters, and social media accounts allegedly spreading defamatory content. All demonstrations, speeches, and online publications were requested to cease within 1x24 hours.
Failure to comply, they stated, could result in criminal proceedings through the cyber division of the police, as well as civil lawsuits for unlawful acts under Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), with compensation claims reaching billions.
"Law must not be intimidated by mass pressure. We are ready to take this case through official legal channels," Berliana concluded.
(IDNC)REPORTER: Adli Safwan | EDITOR: Fik Sagala